On July 23, Li Jing’s new paper entitled ‘Advances in the Design of Urban CO2 Emission Monitoring Networks：A Review‘ was accepted for publication in Carbon Research. It is a nice and very useful review paper. Congratulations!
Figure 4. Global city-scale carbon emissions. The pink bars indicate city-wide atmospheric CO₂ enhancements relative to background levels (see Table 1), while the blue bars represent ¹⁴C-derived FFCO₂ emissions, the green bars represent differences between posterior (inversion) and prior (inventory) FFCO₂ emissions (see Table 3). The inversion results shown here are derived from well-documented urban CO2 monitoring networks that utilize tower-based or surface observations to support top-down validation of emission inventories. Dots mark the locations of global cities, overlaid on a colored background map showing fossil fuel CO₂ emissions in December 2022 from the ODIAC inventory (Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO2)(Tomohiro & Shamil, 2015). The 14C-derived fossil fuel CO₂ including data from (W. J. Zhou et al., 2020) (Urumqi, Harbin, Guiyang, Lanzhou, Chongqing, Xi’an, Beijing, Wuhan), (Niu et al., 2016) (Xiamen), (Ding et al., 2013) (Guangzhou), (Sharma et al., 2023) (Indian), (Santos et al., 2019) (Rio de Janeiro), (Miller et al., 2020) (Los Angeles), (Turnbull et al., 2015) (Indianapolis), (Zazzeri et al., 2023) (London),(Lopez et al., 2013) (Paris), (Molnár et al., 2010) (Debrecen), (Levin & Rödenbeck, 2008) (Heidelberg), (Svetlik et al., 2010)(Bratislava, Prague), (Piotrowska et al., 2020) (Gliwice), (Zimnoch et al., 2012) (Krakow).
